Take-Home Final Exam Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Take-Home Final Exam Questions - Assignment typeAll that we ever see be the qualities of an object that our faculty of vision is capable of sensing. Hence, it implies that any habituated thing is a mere bundle of perceptions or the summation of its perceived qualities. There is zippo unwrap there that we do not have some perception of. Furthermore, since things like substance or publication is never perceived or perceived, it cannot be said to exist. And if substance does not exist and single sensed qualities be real or all are sensations, then only thinking or as Berkeley says, spiritual or mental beings exist, for according to him, it is impossible ever to think of anything except as colligate to a mind. 3. Why does Berkeley recollect it must be theology (rather than material substance) that is the cause of our perceptions? Since any accustomed thing is a mere bundle of perceptions, we know that physical objects exist since we can perceive its qualities. However, this r aises a problem when it comes to things that we do not perceive. How then do we cut the things that do exist however are not being perceived by us? Berkeley says then that there are separate limited minds, and are therefore perceiving those other things that exist, but apart from my mortal mind or that of other finite minds, there must be something or someone who is responsible for guaranteeing order in our sensations and perceptions. Moreover, something cannot come from nothing hence our finite minds must have originated from a creator. And since all human beings are always inattentive from things, there is then an omnipresent mind, which knows and perceives all things. The existence of material objects therefore depends on the existence of matinee idol, for God is the cause of the order found in nature and is the cause of the existence of our minds. These thinkers, which exist in our minds yet do not perceive, are Gods ideas, which He communicates to us so that what we per ceive by means of sensation are not to be caused by material substances, but rather, by God. Hence, God eer gives us sensations in our everyday life. He gives us certain ideas, which help us categorize in an orderly manner all our sensations. Therefore, the continued existence of objects when we do not perceive them is explained by Gods continuous perception of them. 4. Why does Hume believe that causation is not a necessary association between events, but only an observation of constant conjunction? Hume dismisses the idea of necessary connection because first, severally impression is a separate experience, and second, what give-up the ghosts in the past may not necessarily happen in the future. And in his dismissal of necessary connection, it implies that causation only happens in the mind and is only due to constant conjunction meaning we experience a series of events which happen in succession. So, if the idea of necessary connection is seen in our connecting of ideas, then causality then occurs only within our minds it is no other than a psychological law of association of ideas, a mere habit of the mind. 7. Why does Kant believe that the existence of synthetic a priori truths is such a big deal? Synthetic a priori truths already post its predicate in its subject, but are not dependent on experience and are affirmed to be universal truths. By Kants analysis and presentation of synthetic a priori truths, it enabled him to justify numerical and scientific principles, which can give us knowledge with certainty, and thereby further extending our knowledge of the world. For example, the mathematical proposition, (1 + 2 = 3) this is classified as synthetic a priori synthetic because 1, +, and 2 does not contain the idea of